on Nehemiah's wall

It was real! [To quote Gomer: Surprise, surprise, surprise!!] Check out this article describing the find.

Regards
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

on softness and specifics

I sort of agree with the complaints voiced over at My Two Cents in critique of an article entitled "Fundamentalism's Great Softness". I have wanted to jump in and add my voice to the comments, but have restrained myself! (Amazing but true!)

Of course, that restraint is only "so far" and "until now".

I want to add some 'wait a minute' statements:

• I am reading Isaiah right now in my devotions. Last week I read Micah and Hosea. Beyond identifying the group of people these prophets spoke to (i.e., Israel, Judah, Ephraim, etc.) how often were the prophets specific in their charges or against specific individuals/institutions within Israel/Judah? Must a current writer be specific in order to make a point?
  
  
• Does anyone really deny that there is a 'softness' creeping over fundamentalism? Consider the many blogs purporting to be by fundamentalists yet advocating such things as contemporary music styles, looser standards of dress, and even going so far as to advocate the use of alcohol. I could list more subjects, but does anyone really deny that there is a push towards looser personal standards?
  
  By the way... in some respects, I am looser than some of my fundamentalist forbears, especially in areas like dress standards. I stand against immodest and worldly dress [as I understand it] but I am not against such things as 'pants on women' or insist on men wearing suits to church or even as a pastor dressing in a tie during the week... call me a liberal...
  
  My point, though, is this: let's not kid ourselves about the lack of softness in fundamentalism. Softness is everywhere. Some of it may be a legitimate softening of previously unreasonably hard positions. Some of it is compromise with the world, plain and simple.
  
  
• Ivan Foster, no softie, publishes an article by "an American Observer" [i.e., read Anonymous Coward] entitled "Radical Changes afoot at Bob Jones University" In the article University spokesmen are quoted saying that things said in the past wouldn't be said in the present, at least not the same way. Would you say that this is evidence of softening or hardening?
  
  By the way, the BJU folks may be right in making these changes. I am personally reserving judgement to see where things end up. I am concerned, as an alum and a parent of current students. May God keep the University as the premier fundamentalist institution in the world! But the changes bear watching and who can deny that this is a softening of previously held positions?

I cannot speak for the writer of The Projector article, but these last two points may be the kind of thing he was aiming at.

It is undeniable that fundamentalism has softened in many respects. I have offered examples of softening at two ends of the spectrum, so to speak. I think that the reader can supply plenty of evidence of softening in between the 'lower level' of softening exhibited by individuals and the 'higher level' of softening at some (all?) of our fundamentalist institutions. Many many churches with fundamentalist heritages are softening. Some are softening right out of fundamentalism altogether.

Some softening may be warranted. Is all of it? We don't know the answer to that question yet.

Regards
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

on a wise word from a young fundamentalist

My Number One Son sent me a link to an article written by a friend of his. I guess since they are both young and fundamentalists, that makes them 'young fundamentalists'.

But...

Not of the usual sort. That is, not of the usual sort of mindset you think of when that term is used. The article is entitled The Errors of "Recovering Fundamentalists" by Lincoln Mullen.

If you haven't seen this article, I encourage you to read it. It is refreshing to read a young man with an unapologetic approach to fundamentalism.

Regards
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

on Rm 1.7 and Lk 11.1-4

I see I have posted nothing since our last sermon summaries. It has been a busy week with a few of my men as they helped me repair my deck. I thought it would be a two day job. I should know by now to multiply my time estimates by at least 2 and a half. At least the job is pretty much done, just a few finishing touches left this week if the weather cooperates. Now for this week's sermons:

To all that be in Rome (Rm 1.7)

I told our people today that my aim was to make the message of Romans personal, as if the letter was written personally to them. After all, as Paul addresses the letter, it is to a local church, made up of real believers - and only believers. These believers are seen in the three terms describing the church in Rome in 1.6-7: called of Jesus Christ [belonging to Christ]; beloved of God [just as Christ is God's beloved, so we, in Christ, are beloved], called saints [named as holy ones, by virtue of the new birth].

The people addressed by 'to all that be in Rome' have these three characteristics, clearly and distinctly they are Christians. This is a Baptist idea. The local church should attempt to maintain an exclusively regenerate membership by careful examination of applicants and purging of false professors who may accidentally be admitted.

But the infinite blessing of the passage is that which is offered the local church of Rome by God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: grace & peace. For grace, I like this line I found in Donald Grey Barnhouse: "Love that goes upward is worship; love that goes outward is affection; love that stoops is grace." [Donald Grey Barnhouse, Romans, Vol.1, p. 72.] Peace is the Hebrew part of Paul's formulaic greeting - it is a regular formula, but full of meaning. The Hebrew concept is shalom, wholeness, well-being in the whole person. This is the blessing offered to the local church at Rome, and I believe, to every local church through time since then. This is what makes the letter to Romans personal. I closed with this application:

1. Does God have any less care for you or for this local church than he does for the ‘Grace Baptist Church of Rome’ in ad 57?

I have prayed with some of you when you made things right with God. At that moment, I believe God our Father stooped down from heaven and spoke grace to you and our Lord Jesus Christ gave you peace.

I have sat by your bedsides in the hospital, offering prayers for your physical well-being. At that moment, I believe God our Father stooped down from heaven and spoke grace to you and our Lord Jesus Christ gave you peace.

I have walked to graves with some of you, and will probably do so again… At those moments, I believe God our Father stooped down from heaven and spoke grace to you and our Lord Jesus Christ gave you peace.

2. Our union as a local church is created in the love of God and the grace and peace offered personally to you in Jesus Christ.

Our conclusion invited anyone who is outside the beloved to repent of their sins and enter the household of God.

When Ye Pray (Lk 11.1-4)

We continue our series on prayer, begun last week. The Lord's answer to the disciple's prayer, "Lord, teach us to pray" is first of all to give us the prayer we call "The Lord's Prayer". This is similar to the record given us in Matthew 6, but the differences in the passages make it clear that the same teaching was given on two separate occasions. The fact that the Lord taught the same thing twice indicates that it was a regular feature of his teaching and highlights the importance placed on it by the Holy Spirit. Understanding and practicing the concepts in this prayer is vital to our spiritual lives.

There are essentially five petitions in this model prayer as given in Luke:

1. The prayer for hallowing God's name: if you long for a day when this is true in the world, pray for it! If you long for a day when this is completely true in your life, pray for it!
2. The prayer for the kingdom: do you agree with the preaching of John the Baptist, Jesus, the 12, and the seventy? Is the Lord your king? Pray for your submission to his rule and for his kingdom to come in the earth.
3. The prayer for daily bread: the Lord provides all we have, though in our culture we may be much less aware of it than the 1st century. There is only enough food on the Island to last us a few weeks - if we were suddenly cut off from the mainland by some catastrophe, we would be very aware of our utter dependence. Prayer for our bread and other physical needs is legitimized by this petition taught us by the Lord.
4. The prayer for forgiveness: our spiritual neediness is a daily concern - read 1 Jn 1.6-2.1 if you think you have no need of regular forgiveness of sin and restoration to fellowship with God. If you forgive others (Eph 4.32) you display evidence that God is your Father and can have assurance that this petition will be heard.
5. The prayer for deliverance out of temptation: what Christian does not need to pray for this? It is essentially a prayer for one's own faithfulness. May God keep us in all our trials.

There is much more that could be said about the Lord's prayer and these petitions. May God bless our study and meditation on these Scriptures.

Regards
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3